<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The uncertainty of a post-Microsoft world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.winextra.com/2010/01/25/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.winextra.com/opinion/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/</link>
	<description>Satisfying Your Inner Nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.winextra.com/opinion/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.winextra.com/index.php/2010/01/25/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>This argument reminds me of the beginnings of personal computing: until IBM stepped in with the PC in 1981, hardware compatibility from one computer maker to the next was a pipe dream. Even sharing a floppy between computer makers (sometimes between computer &lt;i&gt;models&lt;/i&gt;) was impossible – and I&#039;m only speaking of Intel-based computers. When IBM produced the PC, it wasn&#039;t the most advanced personal computer by any stretch of the imagination, but it provided a common hardware base with published standards (even the full BIOS listing was provided in the technical manual). The industry grew from that base. I remember, Byte magazine even sported a full page ad, paid for by Apple, that said &quot;Welcome IBM&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This argument reminds me of the beginnings of personal computing: until IBM stepped in with the PC in 1981, hardware compatibility from one computer maker to the next was a pipe dream. Even sharing a floppy between computer makers (sometimes between computer <i>models</i>) was impossible – and I&#8217;m only speaking of Intel-based computers. When IBM produced the PC, it wasn&#8217;t the most advanced personal computer by any stretch of the imagination, but it provided a common hardware base with published standards (even the full BIOS listing was provided in the technical manual). The industry grew from that base. I remember, Byte magazine even sported a full page ad, paid for by Apple, that said &#8220;Welcome IBM&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.winextra.com/opinion/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/comment-page-1/#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.winextra.com/index.php/2010/01/25/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>This argument reminds me of the beginnings of personal computing: until IBM stepped in with the PC in 1981, hardware compatibility from one computer maker to the next was a pipe dream. Even sharing a floppy between computer makers (sometimes between computer &lt;i&gt;models&lt;/i&gt;) was impossible – and I&#039;m only speaking of Intel-based computers. When IBM produced the PC, it wasn&#039;t the most advanced personal computer by any stretch of the imagination, but it provided a common hardware base with published standards (even the full BIOS listing was provided in the technical manual). The industry grew from that base. I remember, Byte magazine even sported a full page ad, paid for by Apple, that said &quot;Welcome IBM&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This argument reminds me of the beginnings of personal computing: until IBM stepped in with the PC in 1981, hardware compatibility from one computer maker to the next was a pipe dream. Even sharing a floppy between computer makers (sometimes between computer <i>models</i>) was impossible – and I&#8217;m only speaking of Intel-based computers. When IBM produced the PC, it wasn&#8217;t the most advanced personal computer by any stretch of the imagination, but it provided a common hardware base with published standards (even the full BIOS listing was provided in the technical manual). The industry grew from that base. I remember, Byte magazine even sported a full page ad, paid for by Apple, that said &#8220;Welcome IBM&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention WinExtra - The uncertainty of a post-Microsoft world -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.winextra.com/opinion/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention WinExtra - The uncertainty of a post-Microsoft world -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.winextra.com/index.php/2010/01/25/the-uncertainty-of-a-post-microsoft-world/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vlad Bobleanta and Steven Hodson, WinExtra. WinExtra said: Post: The uncertainty of a post-Microsoft world - http://clicky.me/B71 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vlad Bobleanta and Steven Hodson, WinExtra. WinExtra said: Post: The uncertainty of a post-Microsoft world &#8211; <a href="http://clicky.me/B71" rel="nofollow">http://clicky.me/B71</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

