Google

Let’s look at Windows 7 as a fresh start

Written on:July 30, 2009
Comments are closed

John Gruber over at Daring Fireball had an excellent post today where he talked about Microsoft, Windows and what he sees as the slow decline of the company and product. For those who don’t recognize the name John is a highly respected blogger in the Apple community as well as the tech community in general and that is why I read his posts faithfully. Anyway in his post today this one section caught my attention and got me thinking

Vista was a disaster for Microsoft. Windows 7 is, supposedly, the light at the end of the tunnel. But the best consensus about Windows 7 is only that it’s not going to be a complete and total clusterfuck like Vista. That it’s something XP users will actually want to upgrade to. Something that, when it comes pre-installed on a new machine, will not prompt questions about how to downgrade to XP.

But no one seems to be arguing that Windows 7 is something that will tempt Mac users to switch, or to tempt even recent Mac converts to switch back. It doesn’t even seem to be in the realm of debate. But if Windows 7 is actually any good, why wouldn’t it tempt at least some segment of Mac users to switch? Windows 95, 98, and XP did.

Microsoft seems to have conceded that the enthusiasts who’ve switched to the Mac in recent years are gone for good. Their apparent goal for Windows 7 was merely to make something better than Windows Vista. If Microsoft were a healthy, functional, competitive company willing and able to honestly assess its own shortcomings — like the Microsoft of the ’90s that conquered the entire industry — their goal would have been to make something not just better than Vista, but better than anything else on the market, including Mac OS X.

I agree with John when he says Windows 7 isn’t really anything that will convert OS X users away but I don’t think that is the point right now.

Microsoft has a much bigger problem that it has to deal with at this point – keeping the users and companies they already have. Yes Vista was more than problematic for them and will probably go down in Microsoft history as another WinME or Microsoft Bob and it is that they need to deal with first not trying to convert Mac users.

What I think will be the progression from this point is that Windows 7 will be a fresh start for Microsoft. It will be the operating system that companies will be less hesitant to upgrade to and it will be one that ease the transition from XP for the average consumer.

Once they have managed to stem the flow away due to the stability that Windows 7 will bring to the table then and only then can Microsoft even consider on trying to encourage old Windows user back. The main objective of Windows 7 is stability and creating the solid foundation on which they can move forward with future versions.

I don’t even expect with Windows 8 (or whatever they end up calling it) that we will see any radical changes other than further improvement on things like touch. What I do expect to see is an even further strengthening of the foundation and quite possibly an increased push for 64bit adoption.

Beyond that point however I could see a real push to advance the Windows platform into some new territories that might at that point try to entice new users from the Mac camp. Unlike John I do think that Microsoft has recognized how badly they have screwed up over the last few years – it might only be internally in the boardroom but Windows 7 is their new roadmap forward.

And it just might be the roadmap that as John suggests could be the one that will let them conquer the market as they did in the 90’s.

Related posts:

  1. Windows 7 On Track For Late 2009
  2. Bye bye Windows Mobile, Hello Windows Phone
  3. Create a bootable USB for installing Windows 7
  4. Microsoft’s Cloud OS Has A Name – Maybe
  5. Hey Windows developers please save my data to the cloud
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

interesting point of view but I think that once Microsoft has stabilized itself around Windows 7 we'll start seeing some innovation in future versions of Windows. However I would point out that has been doing some pretty interesting stuff as evidenced by things like PhotoSynth and Seadragon. Even their browser could be looking at some real improvement if the work on Gazelle is any indication.

I wouldn't count Microsoft out just yet when it comes to innovation or quality - they've just needed to find their feet again and I think Windows 7 has done that.

just a quick note about Media Player 12 - this is another thing that has seen some real improvement over past versions. It takes up a much smaller resource footprint than previous version. WMP has alway been a resource hog so it was nice to see this big improvement.

On the surface there may not seem like much of a reason to move to Win7 but there are some definite reasons under the hood to make the move. Win7 is a smaller tighter code base than than Vista and the driver support is the best I have seen with any Windows release. I remember with Vista that both nVidia and ATI driver support was terrible. With Win7 both of them have been right there since the earliest beta with video driver support. I also think that when it comes the 'eye candy' Win7 is a vast improvement over Vista.

Unlike Vista I would heartily recommend Win7 as a viable upgrade for the operating system.

Strangely enough, our household used to swear by XP, and now there isn't a single XP machine in our house, and life is honestly much simpler.

My wife got a new desktop at almost the exact same time they released the W7 beta, so it was a logical candidate, particularly since she was running win2k before that. She seems really happy with w7. My main leisure desktop that is used mostly for web email & multimedia etc, was an XP box, that ran into several issues, that i could never resolve. I'm now using a variant of linux for these tasks, and have done so since a few months before the w7 beta was released. Thanks to synaptic, and a helpful Open source community, life is a whole lot easier.

I have a laptop that ran vista, and had been toying with moving it to either W7 or Linux. I recently loaded W7 for one primary reason - Media player 12. That is the only UpnP media server I have been able to find that just works with my new TV, the setup hassles I was having with vista and some of the 3rd party apps, meant that after a lot of research I stopped with the first one that worked.

The other great thing is al of the games that used to work ok on XP and then refused to run on vista now work again on W7.

I think most Joe/Jane computer users are likely to be using vista rather XP as they will have gotten their computer at a discount from a big box retailer using easy credit with vista bundled and will come by w7 the same way.

For me, if w7 had been more of the same vista retardedness, I would have continued with linux. If my wife had disliked w7 i would have tried getting her to install linux - (I had already convinced her to give it a try when the w7 beta was released while the new desktop was being shipped).

The challenge for me now, is that up until now, the price of running w7 RC has been the same as running Linux, with a similar ease of use. I am prepared to bear a reasonable cost to use w7, as it is a really good OS, but if the cost becomes unreasonable (after all the laptop is simply an upgrade from a Vista home premium), then I'm likely to continue with linux.

I am actually amazed at how easy life is since changing to these 2 OSes

The central problem that John pointed out is that although Microsoft may know they've screwed up, in response they've completely surrendered quality and innovation. Marketing Windows as "crap you buy when you can't afford something good" does not look like the path back to market dominance.

As a dedicated Mac user, I find this especially upsetting. Where Apple is one among other options (hardware, OS), they offer many excellent reasons to choose their tools. Where they have managed to dominate the market (iPod, iTunes, App store) Apple is a pushy, closed, unresponsive bully.

If Microsoft is now done with giving people reasons to actively choose Windows (aside from "cheaply made hardware") then I'm selfishly afraid of what it's going to do to Apple...

This is a serious question, "What compelling reason(s) does a Joe/Jane Average XP user have to upgrade to Windows 7?" Aside from the 'Microsoft will discontinue supporting XP' concern I have difficulty recognizing a clear benefit from upgrading. (I will acknowledge the "Eye-candy" value of W7 which has always been a driving force in the PC world.)