Related Post

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    If there are no links in a post in which assertions of any kind are made, I assume those assertions are untrue.
    • ^
    • v
    I didn't say they weren't important. I said that it appears they are lessening. That's much different.

    I said:

    1) I believe in linking, especially to peers, and down-market
    2) That anybody expecting big traffic from links from big blogs is sorely mistaken
    3) That a significant majority of traffic is not coming from blog links

    None of those say that linking is not important. You know my record and how I link. It has nothing to do with being "more popular" or not, and I never said anything about referencing Scoble. You got that out of the ether.
    • ^
    • v
    I never said anything about you referencing Robert. I used his post as a tie-in to what I was trying to point out .. a setup to the post so to speak.

    And yes I know what you policy about linking out is - your post was a very good example of that. - but with a title like "The Importance Of Blog Linking Seems to Be Declining " I was trying to point out just why they are still important. I just get a little tired of folks that make pronouncements like comments are dead and links are declining in importance. It's like we need to constantly tear apart things for no other reason that making a headline out of it.

    I just wanted to provide the opposing viewpoint as to why it doesn't matter if links drive traffic from big names like Robert or even yourself - links have a far more important use than that.

Trackbacks

blog comments powered by Disqus