Related Post

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    "Any technology that is going to have significant impact over the next 10 years is already at least 10 years old". Bill Buxton over at BusinessWeek made a good point in his article The Long Nose of Innovation that could be applied here. Broadband providers still have some maturing to do before becoming ubiquitous. Exposing the general public to issues like throttling and net neutrality would not be beneficial to anyone at this point. The fat pipe may be the missing requirement for future technologies but we need to deal with pressure testing the pipe first.
    • ^
    • v
    This same divide isn't just about the cost of the service, it's about being able to get the service in the first place. Canada's a huge country and while the majority of the population is close enough to major centers to have access to the big pipes, there's still a lot of places that are dependent upon dialup.
    • ^
    • v
    While I agree with Tim strongly with regards to Microsoft, Yahoo (and Google) and he's probably right about the other stuff too, but he may be thinking 100 years down the road. In the mid-to-late 1990s when Sun Microsystems was obsessed with beating Microsoft (seemingly in the same way MSFT is obsessed with beating Google which should be the sure sign to them why they are NOT on a good path) they tried to facilitate even then the whole notion of the NETWORK BEING THE COMPUTER.

    We still all need hardware and software, but there's no doubt, that if you have good broadband that things are a little further down that path. But only a little further really. But I think Tim, rather than being elitist is merely dreaming of the future. He just may see that future as being nearer-term than some of the rest of us.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus