Living in a bubble - a blogosphere reality check

Which bubble do you live in? I find it fascinating at times at the sense of self importance that permeates this little tech world we live in as bloggers. With words like co-presence, new media, self regulating environment. With self-important concepts like Cluetrain Manifesto, blogger code of conduct and the inevitable A-List. It is with these things that we build ourselves a world within a world.

The reality is though that outside of our little insular world of blogs and co-presence what we do has no importance. To your average neighbor Justin is just some weird guy walking around with a camera attached to his body, blogs are just another confusing computer term and the cluetrain might just as well be the mid-afternoon commuter train in any major metropolitan city.

Things like citizen journalism might be shaking up the business world of media but to Mr. or Mrs Average Citizen it’s just another method that the media provides them with the news. They don’t care about the how or the why. They don’t care about the technology or the raging battle going on in the boxing ring between old style journalists and those frisky new kids on the block sporting fancy websites with constantly updated streams of news and rumours. No .. for the average person on the street the news is still what they see on the television and read in the paper - how it gets there doesn’t matter one iota.

Even within this little world of blogging we see divisions of ideals and concepts. Where in the tech bubble we see high browed discussions of old guard vs new kids and squabble about the existence of something called an A-List we also have other circles of interest that couldn’t care less about our delusions of self-importance.

Where we toss around the ethics of conduct and the reality of ranks there are sections of the blogosphere like the poli-sphere where they snicker at terms like A-List and prefer to keep count of the bodies left bloodied in the comment sections of their battlefields. Where the tech-sphere might be looked upon as the gentile uncle the poli-sphere would closer resemble the hard drinking brawling cousin that no-one likes to admit is a member of the family. All the while the rest of the family looks at both of them as mild curiosities to be put up with.

We; bloggers in general and tech bloggers specifically, like to think that what we are doing will have a profound effect on the way our society moves forward. We like to think that things like a guy with a camera strapped to his body or being able to watch Robert Scoble ramble on while his wife drives their car down some highway is the forebearer of great things to come. 

The truth of the matter is that for the person worrying about making next month’s rent or being able to pay their child’s doctor bill without bankrupting themselves none of this has or ever will matter. If anything the poli-sphere for all it’s partisanship and bloodied knuckles is far more relevant to our daily lives than any post of thoughtful consideration from the tech-sphere.

As Rob Hyndman eloquently put it in a post recently

Last point. Unless I completely missed my aim in this post, it ought to be obvious that I’ve been mightily unimpressed with the geek-’sphere lately. Call it a growing feeling that it’s largely irrelevant. I’m not saying that I think that the existence of the ’sphere itself doesn’t matter - it’s obviously a profoundly important development - a sea-change - in media. That’s at the heart of why I’m involved in mesh. I just think that most of the discussions on the tech side of it are trivial. And, not really true conversations, but mostly efforts by folks to brand themselves as experts, for their own purposes. PR, really. And I’m getting tired of reading through my tech feeds and feeling like I just ate a boatload of empty calories.

Sure it is nice to be able to write about things we are passionate about but there is a very fine line between being relevant and being the boring old uncle puffing on a pipe in an wingback chair by the fireplace. The tech-sphere walks this line on a daily basis but fails to see that in its puffery of self-importance that people have stop listening - if they were even listening in the first place.

Conversation Tags: , , , ,



Related Posts:







12 Comments

  1. Posted April 15, 2007 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    Great post, it stuns me every day how much technologists in general believe the rest of the world lives in the same sphere as we all do, especially those of us living in the Bay Area. I think if they actually put a wall up lining the land mass of the peninsula and SF, it *might* help people understand a little… ;)

  2. Posted April 15, 2007 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Jeremy

    I was beginning to wonder if I was lone man out here especially when Robert thinks I’m just postering and Adriana over at MediaInfluencer called the post an example of off-line thinking
    :)

  3. Posted April 15, 2007 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Cast your mind back to 1997. How many people had cellular phones?

    Not many. They were big, expensive to run and there were very few other people you could call immediately.

    Then calls and phones became cheaper, and the cell and “txt” became everywhere. Even those who have difficulty affording health care.

    I think that the “geek-o-sphere” is experimenting with new technologies that whilst expensive now, do provide a pre-cursor to what is coming.

    All kids, whether they use a library computer or their own at home have a Myspace and/or Live Messenger. This is how they socialise. If you are not there, you are not in the social network.

    It may not be cheap/accessible today - but it will be one day - and the “geek-o-sphere” is rightly testing the bounds, finding the cracks and ethical/moral dilemas. And moving on to the next big thing.

  4. Posted April 15, 2007 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    very valid points Nick - up to a point.

    I don’t have a cellphone and I can tell you that no child of mine who couldn’t afford to pay their own bill would have one either.

    Just because it has become a so-called social norm doesn’t make it right.

    As for kids and computers .. I can tell that I know many from 7 right through to teens who do not have computer and some of them want nothing to do with them - are they going to become the next lost generation?

    we are being conditioned to think of a life without computer and web interaction as something that is abnormal but is it really?

    The problem I have with technologists - and I include myself in this as well - is that they can’t concieve of a world without these machines whereas the vast majority of people who do use them consider them as nothing more than someting to play games on or download music to. This doesn’t even take into consideration the segment of society that couldn’t care less about them - which I count my wife as among and she has no problem with that.

  5. Posted April 15, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    A little of a cultural difference happening here in Australia: the penetration rate of cell phones is greater than the population of the country (ie: saturation rate > 100%)

    Listening to Leading minds in Australian teaching: the new challenges are-

    One, the cell phone as the new platform for the next generation. This has tipped in the last 2-3 years as billing options have changed; and TXT in Australia is billed on sender, not receiver.

    Two, that social networks like the Myspace/YouTube/IM and lastly, free email like Hotmail, are vitally important social networks that extend within and without the school boundary. Wikipedia, and the read/write web in general is challenging us older people in ways forseen by a small portion of the geek-o-sphere/blog-o-sphere.

    Twitter and Ustream are just variations on old themes (IRC and Cuseeme, respectively)

    I agree with a portion of your argument: that technologists today are not thinking about the impact on the next generation.

    I am sure the scientists who invented TV and radio broadcasting never thought thought thru’ the implications of their technologies, either.

  6. some guy
    Posted April 15, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Complaining about self-important navelgazing tools who want to create an Internet social club in order to cope with their lack of conventional social skills by making a post entirely addressed to and likely only to be read by those people is a great idea.

    And the Internet does matter. Anyone who thinks it’s just a place to buy shit and find porn is a moron and I don’t agree with them. I don’t care if most people disagree. Most people either believe in astrology or Christianity (or, confusingly, both) so it doesn’t mean a damn thing if a belief is widely held.

  7. Posted April 15, 2007 at 8:25 pm | Permalink

    I never said the Internet didn’t matter but that doesn’t change the fact that there is a part of our society who do feel that the Internet doesn’t matter - does that make them stupid? no it doesn’t it is all a matter of personal choice and personal priorities of what is important.

    and since when did making a personal observation equal complaining?

    as for it being a post only those people would read I some how doubt it since I am pretty sure my blog doesn’t rank very high in any of the early adopters feeds.

  8. Posted April 15, 2007 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    While I agree that the blogosphere inflates it’s self importance, my traffic data and reader’s emails suggest that at least some of the average people do care about what I write about. But maybe that’s because I don’t write about technology.

  9. Posted April 16, 2007 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    The weird thing is this - when you talk to people in different industries, say surgeons, or accountants, and they talk about their work, they completely acknowledge and accept the fact that they are in a specialized field.

    They also get the fact that their news is not quite as interesting to the rest of the world.

    Why is it that technologists get so resentful of this concept??

  10. Posted April 16, 2007 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    I think skepticism is healthy. 1) it’s part of the scientific method, and geeks are supposed to be into that sort of thing 2) I’d hate to see another speculative bubble as in Web 1.0 befall Web 2.0 3) Part of me gets tired of clicking through Techmeme and seeing the same old echoes of a press release.

  11. Posted April 17, 2007 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    It does indeed become boring and irrelevant, but for some reason we keep going back. Scoble couldn’t write childrens’ book, his grammar is so poor. So why do I read his drivel everyday….

    It is addictive, that’s why.

    Tim O’Reilly is a pompous ass, but I keep going back.

    Half the time I don’t agree with Rob Hyndman, but he does write so eloquently, who could ignore him?

    So why do we do it?

    It gives me something to bitch about, ponder and pass the hours while I drive. It behooves me to troll around I suppose.

  12. Posted April 18, 2007 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    It just started… I invit you to discover next revolution by lifelog/lifestream (see my sign)

7 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Steven Hodson chimes in with a “blogosphere reality check” and says we’re all living in a bubble: “The reality is though that outside of our [...]

  2. [...] Hodson, writing at his Win Extra blog gives us - Living in a bubble - a blogosphere reality check - an eloquently written piece that every blogger should read… Things like citizen journalism [...]

  3. By links for 2007-04-17 « My Weblog on April 17, 2007 at 5:27 am

    [...] Living in a bubble - a blogosphere reality check | WinExtra (tags: blogging tech ibt4im) [...]

  4. [...] in general, and tech bloggers in particular like to think that our blogging is going to change the world. It won’t. The reality is though that outside of our little insular world of blogs and [...]

  5. [...] to my post about most members of the public simply not getting blogging Steve Hodson seems to have a good take on it too, although Robert Scoble seems to think something bigger is at play…something we all [...]

  6. By Everything In Its Own Time « CodeCorps on April 18, 2007 at 8:52 am

    [...] Posted by codecorps under Uncategorized  Periodically, the question of navel-gazing arises. Steven Hodson thinks that technologists have a little too much “sense of self importance”; Media [...]

  7. [...] Living in a bubble - a blogosphere reality check | WinExtra media, self regulating environment. With self-important concepts like Cluetrain Manifesto, blogger The reality is though that outside of our little insular world of blogs and co-presence what we do [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*